<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel><title><![CDATA[Health Information at Health Care Community - Comments for article: Weight with Indoor Cycling]]></title><link>http://www.healthgoesup.com</link><description /><language>en-us</language><copyright><![CDATA[http://www.healthgoesup.com]]></copyright><generator>N/A</generator><webMaster>admin@healthgoesup.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:35:32 CDT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Comment #1]]></title><link>http://www.healthgoesup.com/articles/37/1/weight-with-indoor-cycling-1.html#Comment27</link><description><![CDATA[Where did you get this idea that "indoor cycling demands too much from the bones."  That's rediculous.  In fact the exact opposite is true.  Cyclists tend to have bone density problems because cycling demands on your frame are minimal--gravity not being a factor in pedalling a bike.  Simply put, we sweat calcium and need to consume more of it than the average, active person because of cycling's low impact on the skeleton.  Conversely, running and walking are very demanding on your bone structure.  Cycling is recommended for pregnant women, and those recovering from bone and joint problems for the very reason you recommend against it.

Cycling is perfect for fat people, plain and simple.  It's the best and most effective way to get them the calorie burning kickstart they need to lose weight.  It's low impact and high benefit.

If you don't know anything about cycling, you shouldn't be giving advice.  After all, what other sport do you recommend for fat people?  Running?<br/><br/>
(Comment posted by John Thiel at 3:56 pm, Mon 29th Mar 2010)]]></description><author>no@spam.com (John Thiel)</author><pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:56:03 CDT]]></pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.healthgoesup.com/articles/37/1/weight-with-indoor-cycling-1.html#Comment27</guid></item></channel></rss>